Monday 23 May 2016

Review Of Final Major Project

My project is a film about domestic violence and actively demonstrates how to respond to it when it breaks out in public. The film lasts one minute and fifty seconds, and would be longer had it not been edited down so much. This is good because through support from my tutors my final outcome has developed to a higher standard than at first. The script went through several changes and I was put under severe limitations concerning equipment and actors.

I have continuously kept records of what I’ve done through my blog and sketchbook. My tutors suggested that I watch particular movies and pick apart how they work. Many screenshots were taken and I have analysed them, annotating the structure and cinematography and how they contribute to a certain emphasis. Museum exhibitions and lectures helped me to rewrite the script and decide on really suitable locations and video effects, derived from particular styles and theories.

I have visited all the exhibitions and internet sources in my Harvard referencing, except for one exhibition which was closed at the time of carrying out research. I adored much of what the exhibitions had on offer, the Crime Museum especially, but they were all either too elaborate to possibly incorporate into my film, or just felt irrelevant. Filming commenced and finished later than I anticipated, due to poor teamwork of the actors I managed to recruit. Because they were all university/sixth form students themselves, they were busy with their own things so couldn’t show up all at the same time.

I started with high ambitions, setting up posters around the Ravensbourne building in an attempt to seek out actors and a crew. I pictured my final project being hugely cinematic, like a professional film, with detailed lighting and dynamic camera angles. Only about two or three Rave students responded to my posters, and it turned out I didn’t need a filming crew. Only one student got a part in my film as an actor, the rest of the cast being old friends, and towards reshoots became ill so I had to take his place. The film is supposed to take place at night, but that wasn’t convenient for any of my actors so I had to darken the film during editing.

The most useful information I got were from lectures by my tutors, who provided useful theories on researching and structuring stories. I have been enthusiastic in approaching my tutors so that they can offer any feedback in terms of script, filming and editing. I wanted this project to come out feeling like a high standard piece of film, and by consulting my tutors over again they kept on pushing me forward.


Teamwork is paramount, but in this case it wasn’t efficient enough. Everyone involved, actors and tutors, should’ve played more of an active role in watching over me and supporting me continuously, as opposed to cropping up on a rare basis. My action plan changed drastically because of this; efficiency is vital. As pointed out in my project proposal, I chose Lens Based Media because I’m drawn to Art’s storytelling aspect, and from this pathway I have gained satisfactory information on how to structure stories, develop characters and deliver messages through the visual medium, which will come in handy when proceeding onto the Fda Illustration at UAL. This course has opened me up to the bigger picture and made me feel more optimistic about my future.

Friday 20 May 2016

FMP Film: Take 3

The third edit has been done. I feel like this is a lot better than the last two because of the video effects, although I feel that the effects are inconsistent in many areas. I'll wait for tutor feedback before finalising anything.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWQo2rxAdRU&feature=youtu.be

Tuesday 17 May 2016

FMP Tom's 2nd Review

The first scream by WOMAN feels too unconvincing. Increase the volume of PROTAGONIST'S footsteps as he runs toward the danger...and add a voice-over of them panting out of breath.

FMP Film: Ian's Review

Ian suggested that I restore the background noise of the street. I have done so and feel that the scenery is a lot more convincing now. Hopefully by Friday - and if Seb is in - I can feel confident that things are going great and get started on video editing, which shouldn't be too hard.

Monday 16 May 2016

FMP Film: Take 2: Tom's Review

Tom says...

The sound is too loud. This can be simply changed along with reduction of unwanted noise.

FMP Film: Take 2

Well, the second edit has been done, without the sound and video editing. It was Tom who suggested I shorten it down this much, and in all honesty it feels a lot better than it did before: It's straight to the point and has the right frantic pace.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvDDxL8tFEI&feature=youtu.be

Now I am going to try and find some video tutorials so that I can conceive some convincing echo effects, because as much as my film may not be great, I still want to try my best to achieve an optimum sound quality.

Friday 13 May 2016

FMP: Seb's Review

I've just shown Seb my first take of my film, and he thought it was really great. There are only two additional shots that I need now which can be done easily, even though he was very critical about the overall structure and how it played out. Structure and Sub-plots are problems that will need severe addressing in the future, and I will try to read "Making A Good Script Great" by Linda Seger (and possibly "Screenplay" by Syd Field; I have assurance from Seb that the former is a lot better). I'd better keep the WhatsApp group chat updated on these new shots...

FMP Film: Take 1

This morning I have compiled all the various elements of my film together. I haven't edited anything yet because I'm just trying to test out the composition, which feels pretty good. I'm not that used to acting but all the same I feel like we could've put more effort into our performances. How I do not know; perhaps it was lack of efficient teamwork that I felt was really letting me down, as all of us involved weren't professionals at filming and acting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgGFovXxKxI&feature=youtu.be

Over this week as I was compiling all the film I'd got so far on Tuesday, I experimented with Premiere Pro's various video effects. I'd looked online for video tutorials on how to darken daytime scenes, but they were very technical and didn't really give off the effect that I wanted. My favourite video effect is the ProcAmp, because it gives the film a very strong contrast and darkness, although the Colour Balance should alter the shadows and highlights to look more spooky/nighttime-esque. Today I will see what my tutors think (provided they have the time to look at my progress) so that I can find what works best.

Monday 9 May 2016

Filming Update

Bad news! One of my actors is ill. My friend is now desperately trying to find another actor to take his place, but if that isn't possible then I will have to stand in myself while another person films.



Mic Practice


Just a quick test to see how well sound is picked up on the settings the CLR showed me. It is pretty good, although a bit silent, but that can be fixed in Premiere Pro and Audition (hopefully).

Filming Commences Again Tonight!!! (Yay!)

I've rented out the Canon 700D again in order to resume filming. The CLR this morning gave me some really good advice and tips when using the Hotshoe Mount Mic, showing me the camera settings and how they relate to the sound. There is a special filter on the 700Ds settings that reduces wind, and tonight (or maybe even today if I get bored) I will test it out and see if they're right.

Note to future self:
Experiment so much more with the equipment supplied to you, especially if they're filming cameras.

Friday 6 May 2016

Editing & Post Production Screencraft

Because shooting isn't scheduled now to commence again until Monday, I have decided to spend my time in the Study Zone to see if any of the books have any good advice on cinematography, editing and filming in general.

The book that caught my eye was "Editing & Post Production Screencraft" by Declan McGrath, which contains interviews with many film editors as they talk about their own personal experiences. They gave away really useful techniques such as how nowadays a mass audience accepts their POV being constantly shifted around the place. Other interesting facts included how close-ups of faces are fine for TV but not feature film, primarily due to screen sizes. Action scenes need to be made dramatic through the conflict and performance of the actors, and it's a lot better to let the audience make their own mind up on how to view the characters without the need for close-ups. Stories have infinite possibilities and it is the editor who controls these possibilities.

A good warning I came across in this book is that the danger of most films nowadays is that they represent their objects a bit too literally, leading to no ambiguity and no incompleteness. The audience needs to contribute to it being complete, otherwise they won't be drawn in as easily.

Source:
McGrath, Declan (2001) Editing & Post-Production Screencraft, Switzerland: RotoVision

Tuesday 3 May 2016

Clockwork Orange Shot Analysis

Stanley Kubrick's "Clockwork Orange" is a film that I heard thrived upon violence and torture, so I thought it would be good to watch and see how Kubrick portrays this negative behaviour. "Clockwork Orange" is now officially one of my favourite movies.


Firstly, I love the way that colour is used. The opening panel which is drenched in red-orange gives off the instant impression that this film is going to be violent, accompanied by eerie music that keeps recurring throughout the film.

The rhythm between light and shadow works spectacularly. Here, the main character of Alex and his friends, out on the street looking for trouble, come across as wanting trouble from the way that their shadows stretch out across the ground in an attempt to dominate the territory. They contrast with the light very well and make Alex look invasive and fearful.


Many of the scenes that involve Alex and his gang causing trouble amongst other people are shot from his POV. It's as if Kubrick wants to put us in Alex's shoes, which we don't really want because we know that he and his gang are bad people. Perhaps this is to indicate that Alex has the potential to change and be good, and put himself in our shoes instead.


This intimidating nature of Alex's is carried out even further when he kneels down and sneers towards the camera. He looks even more invasive here and wants to show us he is the boss of everything, as his friend carries out the raping of a writer's wife.


Kubrick used POV shots to heighten the urgency and terror that Alex was carrying out. It really put us in the movie and demonstrated what he was capable of. Kubrick also uses colour and shading extremely well to further emphasise this feeling of fear and sexual violence.

Sunday 1 May 2016

FMP Acting Update

It feels like a miracle! Pretty soon all of my actors are going to be free for a huge chunk of the last two weeks. Nothing has happened yet so I can only hope and wait...